For those seeking addiction treatment for themselves or a loved one, the TreatmentSolutions.com helpline is a private and convenient solution.
Calls to any general helpline (non-facility specific 1-8XX numbers) for your visit will be answered by American Addiction Centers (AAC).
We are standing by 24/7 to discuss your treatment options. Our representatives work solely for AAC and will discuss whether an AAC facility may be an option for you.
Our helpline is offered at no cost to you and with no obligation to enter into treatment. Neither TreatmentSolutions.com nor AAC receives any commission or other fee that is dependent upon which treatment provider a visitor may ultimately choose.
For more information on AAC’s commitment to ethical marketing and treatment practices, or to learn more about how to select a treatment provider, visit our About AAC page.
If you wish to explore additional treatment options or connect with a specific rehab center, you can browse top-rated listings, or visit SAMHSA.
Do Drug Bans Hinder Scientific Research? Some Scientists Say ‘Yes’
Scientists are calling for a change; they feel (and they make a valid point, being scientists and all…) that the hard bans on drugs like ecstasy (MDMC), LSD, ketamine and magic mushrooms have made it difficult — or impossible altogether — to study drugs and their effects on the human brain, which in turn hampers new developments in medicine and treatment.
According to Reuters, “David Nutt, a professor of neuropsychopharmacology at Imperial College London and a former chief adviser on drugs to the British government… said, ‘If we understand drugs more, and have a more rational approach to them, we will actually end up knowing more about how to deal with drug harms.'”
Nutt believes that the decision to make one drug legal, like alcohol, vs. another drug illegal, like marijuana, is arbitrary. And while he “doesn’t dispute that drugs are harmful… he takes issue with what he says are un-scientific decisions to ban one… while allowing another… to be freely and cheaply available on supermarket shelves.”
So where’s the line? No doubt, illicit drugs must be studied for scientific purposes, as the roots of drug addiction lies in the science of the brain. We know the dangers and pitfalls of alcohol, and many argue they’re no “better” than, say, psychedelics.
What do you think? Should scientists have to spend more time and money in order to study illicit drugs because of drug bans? And if not, wouldn’t that mean the ban on illicit drugs would have to be lifted or lessened? That’s certainly not what needs to happen, but at the same time, a better understanding of all drugs — both legal and illegal — and their effects is pertinent to the advancement in treatment.
Some people still think they can’t have any fun without alcohol. During Alcohol Awareness month, it is a good time to offer fun, fulfilling activities that don’t involve alcohol. Many groups have been working on new and interesting outings and events to let people know that alcohol doesn’t necessarily mean more fun. Alcohol Awareness month […]
Add another loved and respected athlete to the list of those that have admitted to drug abuse. Andre Agassi shocked fans this week when he told The Times that he used crystal methamphetamine. Agassi was one of the most loved and well known tennis players in the 1990’s. His wild boy look and energetic attitude […]
When young people start doing drugs or drinking alcohol, they begin going down a path that leads to some very undesirable consequences. They run the risk of living a life of addiction, getting involved with crime, and ending up in poverty, just to name a few. We need to develop and support more programs aimed […]